Starting the DoubleClick purchase opposite campaign of Microsoft and Google

But it is something where true purpose scrutinizes, whether the DoubleClick purchase of Google is not contrary to antitrust law, in order to obstruct purchase, keeps approaching IT industry.

that the same company receives the intention of Microsoft, enterprise of 100 or more where it has interest in "creation of the free online service market"/in the consumer organization and the like, hits the DoubleClick purchase plan of Google and as signed "the suit book which in the stand, protects the principle of the online service market", approaches, you say.

The fact that you approve to icomp at present time is just Microsoft and But, the gear bottle grant person who serves the president with English , assumed, that even in addition the approval person is, made that the enterprise/corporate name which approves to icomp in the next few days is published clear.

The grant person does not release the list of enterprise/the group which transmitted E-mail. Of course, there is Google in that list, whether or not is, it has not made clear. Furthermore, the IDG News Service requested comment vis-a-vis Google, concerning icomp, but it could not obtain reply.

As for the grant person purpose of icomp establishment has not declared, is the DoubleClick purchase obstruction of Google with. To the last "with enterprise and the consumer organization which it is the place where in order hold anxiety in the DoubleClick purchase of Google, for the online service market to be able to maintain elements of competition, it keeps arguing", that it has done.

But the suit book of icomp, as for being something which the counter confronts in the DoubleClick purchase of Google is clear. You insist that as for group of objectors, when the same purchase is formed, Google controls 80% of announcement on Internet, is contrary to antitrust law.

What anxiety is stated to the DoubleClick purchase of Google is not just Microsoft. On April 20th this year three citizen groups of the United States, when guarantee of privacy protection of Internet user cannot be obtained from both, in order to prohibit purchase, the American Federal Trade Commission (FTC) the petition is submitted.

Vis-a-vis such insistence, as for Google with of the respective company, "Microsoft and the United States Yahoo! And so on, in order online announcement and to strengthen the consumer marketing strategy, acquisition is done ", that it does, insists the justifiability of DoubleClick purchase. "DoubleClick purchase has not obstructed the competition of other companies", is the opinion of Google.

Of course, Microsoft has refuted to the opinion such as that from front. Jack ????? you take charge of public information with Microsoft if September 24th, there is no DoubleClick purchasing plan of Google, that you did not establish, has recognized icomp.

"The DoubleClick purchase with Google, privacy of competition and the consumer of the online service market, in copyright protection, is something which throws serious doubt",

On the one hand it seems that is also the direction which you see that the movement of such Microsoft, they are mere sour grapes. The rumor that is widely known in IT industry Microsoft you tried the purchase of DoubleClick, Google had competed.

By the way, Microsoft the May this year, purchases American of online announcement/marketing service enterprise for 60 hundred million dollars, makes the policy of assuring the expansion of Internet announcement business clear.